Aggressive recruiting everywhere from church pulpits to the internet appears to have helped the university of michigan recover minority enrollment in its incoming freshman class, which had dropped significantly in 2004, the university reported monday. In a 63 decision announced on june 23, 2003, chief justice rehnquist, writing for the court, ruled the universitys point systems predetermined point allocations that awarded 20 points towards admission to underrepresented. In a 63 decision announced on june 23, 2003, the supreme court ruled that the universitys point system was too. Bollinger syllabus criminate on the basis of race, and an order requiring the lsa to offer hamacher admission as a transfer student. The decision of this court got initiated by chief justice rehnquist. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 petitioners gratz and hamacher, both of whom are michigan residents and caucasian, applied for. In october 1997, gratz and hamacher filed a class action suit against the university, the lsa, lee bollinger, and james duderstadt. Several years after cirs historic victory in the fifth circuit, hopwood v. Pdf the future of affirmative action after grutter v. Bollinger case, claiming that it gives an overall advantage to minority students. Bollinger was a case brought to the supreme court over the use of affirmative action in the college admissions process.
The district court originally denied this request, see id. The quiz questions will look at affirmative action and jennifer gratz. Dealing with the principle of equal protection and affirmative action, this lesson asks students to evaluate the courts reasoning in upholding grutter while striking down gratz. In a 63 decision announced on june 23, 2003, chief justice rehnquist, writing for the court, ruled the universitys point systems predetermined point allocations that.
In 2003, the supreme court decided a pair of affirmativeaction cases from the university of michigan. However, in a 63 decision, the justices ruled against michigans undergraduate admissions policy in the gratz v. Texas, which struck down the use of racial preferences in all states in the fifth circuit, the sixth circuit court of appeals upheld the use of the racial preferences program at the university of michigan. Petitioners gratz and hamacher, both of whom are michigan residents and caucasian. But when they hit the airwaves just minutes after the announcement of the twin decisions on racebased admissions at the university of michigangratz v. Case background and primary source documents concerning the supreme court case of gratz v. Syllabus guidelines for those seeking admission to the lsa, including freshman and transfer applicants. In 1995, jennifer gratz and patrick hamacher both applied for admission to the university of michigan college of literature, science, and the arts lsa as residents of the state of michigan. Bollinger was a united states supreme court case regarding the university of michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. Bollinger 2003 suggest that it may now be constitutionally feasible to strengthen affirmative action in federal hrm. The court did not reject the use of racial preferences to encourage diversity.
Bollinger legal information institute cornell university. Petitioners gratz and hamacher, both of whom are michigan residents. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 petitioners gratz and hamacher, both of whom are michigan residents and caucasian, applied for admission to the university of michigans. Argument transcripts chief justices yearend reports on inyo county v. Both were denied admission and told that, although they were qualified, they were not competitive enough applicants to. Also, the program adequately ensures that all factors that may contribute. During the liability phase, the court would determine whether defendants use of race as a factor in admissions decisions violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution. Syllabus criminate on the basis of race, and an order requiring the lsa to of.
The following quiz and worksheet combo will display your knowledge of the case gratz v. While interlocutory appeals were pending in the sixth circuit, that court issued an opinion in grutter v. Bollinger 2003 directions read the case background and key question. Bollinger,2 last terms racial preference decisions, are among the most important civil rights cases decided since brown v. University of texas at austin, the supreme court vacated and remanded an appeals court decision that had rejected a challenge to an affirmative action program modeled on the one approved in gratz, finding that the lower. The university, of course, remains free to modify its system so that. Article information, pdf download for the supreme court rulings in grutter v. The university of michigan developed an admission scale for applicants that provided a maximum of 150 points, with 100 points being all thats needed for guaranteed admission. Race may be considered in an individual assessment, but not as a sole or contributing factor for admission. Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more. Paiuteshoshone indians of bishop community of bishop colony grutter v. Bollinger a 63 majority of the supreme court struck down as unconstitutional michigans pointsbased undergraduate admissions policy, under which minority ethnic groups were given an automatic 20point bonus, with 100 points needed for admission. Constitution, and the federal civil rights statute, 42 u.
Bollinger is a united supreme court case that occurred in the year 2003. In october 1997, gratz and hamacher filed a lawsuit in the united states district court for the eastern district of michigan against respondents, a university, a college, and university officials, alleging racial discrimination. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 the university of michigan law school law school, one of the nations top law schools, follows an of. This article is brought to you for free and open access by law ecommons. Bollinger 2003 an introduction to constitutional law duration. This court granted certiorari in both cases, even though the sixth circuit had not yet rendered judgment in this one. Bollinger, 539 us 244 supreme court 2003 united states. This case requires us to decide whether the use of race as a factor in student admissions by the university of michigan law school law school is unlawful. District court for the eastern district of michigan. Posted on november 6, 2012 constitutional law tags.
The court held that a student admissions process that favors underrepresented minority groups does not violate the fourteenth amendments equal protection clause so long as it takes into account other factors evaluated on an individual. Justice oconnor delivered the opinion of the court. Bollinger as law and as practical politics gail heriot media pundits ordinarily love drama. In 2003, the supreme court decided the landmark cases of gratz v. Bollinger 2003, the supreme court ruled that the use of affirmative action in school admission is constitutional if it treats race as one factor among many, its purpose is. Bollinger audio transcription for opinion announcement june 23, 2003 in gratz v. Audio transcription for oral argument april 01, 2003 in gratz v. The two cases were filed in 1997 by white plaintiffs who alleged that the universitys use of race violated their constitutional right to equal protection of the laws. Oyez oral argument audio transcript of april 1, 2003 supreme court arguments pdf format. They argued that the admission procedure discriminated against certain racial and ethnic groups in violation of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment and title vi of the civil rights act of 1964. On certiorari in the case at hand, the supreme court reversed in part and remanded. Bollinger, the court had a chance to clarify its ruling in bakke and determine the extent to which public universities could constitutionally consider race as a factor in admissions. Bollinger, the plaintiffs, who are caucasians and were denied undergraduate admission to the university of michigan, filed a class action against the university, alleging that the university violated title vi of the civil rights act of 1964, the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the u. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays.
1032 373 980 77 155 1099 43 1619 1633 185 1229 1125 1159 717 306 713 96 1123 683 1257 1047 794 1000 1445 1425 1440 1374 1331 849 1151 782 796 1336